http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50872

I love this summary and video (which, btw, is accurate): "Both groups receive enormous subsidies to promote Canadian television (broadcasters get a 'local programming fee' and cable/sat operators get a state-backed monopoly that keeps foreigners out). Both want more money, and both want the other guy to collect the fee, so they other guy looks like a jerk. A pox on both their houses." Cory Doctorow</a>, BoingBoing, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Video, Canada] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50871

Stowe Boyd shares the video of his interview with Ulrike Reinhard (she also interviewed me a few weeks ago in Toronto). "It runs an hour, and touches on the web from a variety of angles. I touch on 'The Post-Everything Economy', 'What Is The Web Good For', and some thoughts on the web in business." Stowe Boyd</a>, /Message, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Video] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50870

Nice paper looking at the benefits and negatives of social networking. An interesting negative is 'social resistance to change': "Active social networking opens you up to being heavily influenced by others. In a way it subjects you to a new form of social conditioning. Once your network knows you a certain way, it may resist some of your attempts to grow and change." Steve Pavlina</a>, Personal Development for Smart People, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Networks] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50869

OK, now, just a thought. This item concerns a report of a virus that wipes out data on 'jailbroken' Apple iPhones (that is, iPhones that have been unlocked to allow applications from outside Apple's App Store to be installed). Now, let me ask, of all the people in the world, who would have the most incentive to create a virus that attacks iPhones that have broken the bond with the App Store? And who would be uniquely qualified to write a virus that targets just those iPhones? I don't want to make any accusations, but I do want to observe that corporations have a long history of using viruses and malware to get their way. Doug Peterson</a>, doug – off the record, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Apple Inc.] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50868

Doug Peterson asks, "What are the implications of these terms and from other websites for those in education?" Well, let me answer. Here are the terms of use for OLDaily: by reading this website, you agree to reduce your carbon emissions by one half by 2020, you agree to support developing nation debt relief, you agree to make your intellectual and creative content freely available online, and you agree to do one good deed every day. What, you don't like those terms? You're not going to abide by them, even though by reading this far you have agreed to them? OK then. I rest my case. Companies make up these terms of use pretty much arbitrarily - and for all practical purposes, they can be ignored and are ignored (eventually, the law will reconcile it with this fact). For those of you who always abide by terms of use: just be glad I didn't demand half your salary. Doug Peterson</a>, doug – off the record, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Patents, Thomson Corporation] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50867

Leigh Blackall: "There has been a long and [barren] relationship between education and popular culture for over a century now. Education has been absent from reality for as long as I've been a part of it and today is no different - even when Social Media has direct associations to the rhetoric of educational practice... The challenge I think, is to educationally consider the culture being recorded in these mediascapes, in such a way so as to ask let alone answer more than the obvious questions." Leigh Blackall</a>, Weblog, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Connectivism] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50866

Interesting presentation of Google Apps as e-portfolio from electronicportfolios.org. Via Tex2All. Helen Barrett</a>, electronicportfolios.org, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Google, E-Portfolios] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50865

What interests me here is that in order to present this 3D version of the painting, it is necessary to use video and movement. Guernica is, o course, as powerful as ever. John Connell</a>, Weblog, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Video] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50864

Video recording o George Siemens's talk in Oslo. George Siemens</a>, elearnspace, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Connectivism, Video] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50863

I meant to run this in October when it came out, but it slipped under the radar. Oh well - better late than never, because I still think it's worth highlighting. "The ability to let students decide how to approach their subjects encourages them to take ownership of their learning, said Danis. 'The more choice you give kids, the deeper the learning is,' he said." You know, people say I'm just an idealist for promoting student-directed learning, but I've been pointing to successful examples for years, and I've come to think that the impractical idealists are those who cling to the old and outmoded models of instruction in the faith that, unlike last year, it will work this year. Sarah McGinnis</a>, Calgary Hedrald, November 27, 2009 [Tags: Schools, Online Learning] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50862

As someone who creates posts and edits links (in part) by hand, I have also noticed the 'link pollution' being propagated by Google and Feedburner (note that links served through OLDaily are always cleaned of 'utm' link garbage and redirects (such as Feedproxy or Feedburner) are dereferenced to provide actual (original) links). Link pollution like this breaks the system of using URIs as identifiers. I have long argued against the use of Feedburner; now we have more reasons: "1) it can pollute your links, first by appending them with Google Analytics tracking codes, then by rewriting the link as a proxied link; 2) you have no idea what future 'innovations' the Goog will introduce to pollute your feed even further." And yes, I'm also tempted to rewrite Google analytics code to highlight my own web site. Tiny Hirst</a>, OUseful Info, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Google] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50861

Video with contributions from people around the world (but mostly from Canada and the U.S.) describing how we connect with each other. There is broad agreement that the most important thing (as Alan Levine says) is to find something that's comfortable, that's meaningful, and ultimately, that's personal. D'Arcy Norman</a>, Weblog, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Video, Canada] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50860

I liked this presentation, which suggests a design approach based more on getting learners to solve problems rather than remember facts. The proof, suggests Cathy Moore, is in the results: the problem-based approach, using scenarios, will actually improve performance. "Since many clients don't actually measure the effectiveness of their materials and just want information put online quickly, it can be hard to argue for immersive scenarios. Have you successfully used scenarios? Did you have to convince stakeholders to let you use them?" Cathy Moore</a>, Making Change, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Online Learning] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50859

"Is Wikipedia," asks Steve Wheeler, "dying a slow death?" That might be a fair conclusion to draw following this report, "that Wikipedia has lost 49,000 editors in just a few months." Larry Sanger, who created Citizendium as a response to Wikipedia, suggests that Wikipedia was just the first draft, but "The Wikipedia experiment has deeply suffered as a result of its radical embrace of the most extreme egalitarian and anarchistic principles - which have made the community, as such principles always will do, descend into mob rule and a failed state, so to speak." My own take, entered as a comment on Sanger's post, is that Wikipedia's legion of article police are the cause of the decline. "They leave these little notes on articles - "this item should be deleted" - "this item doesn't cite published sources" - which basically attach contributions rather than improve upon them." Steve Wheeler</a>, Learning with 'e's, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Books, Wikipedia] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50858

Ignatia reports, "The European Commission JRC (Joint Research Center), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies released last week at the EU Ministerial Conference on e-Government a comprehensive report on social and economic implications of Social Computing [aka Web2.0, social media]." The 138 page report contains 9 chapters, each by different authors. It suggests, "Social Computing is now mainstream and companies and policymakers cannot afford to overlook it." Also, "Social Computing is novel and disruptive as it enables the open collaborative creation and sharing of content by users and the re-use of this content for a multitude of purposes." And "Social Computing has the potential
to reshape work, health and learning." Yves Punie, et.al., eds.</a>, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Information, European Union] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50857

Just in case it's not obvious, I want tyo go on record as agreeing with those who predict that News Corp's anti-Google action will fail. It's not simply because the company is trying to create scarcity instead of value - other industries (the OPEC cartel, the diamond industry, etc.) have succeeded at this. It's because it doesn't create a fair marketplace. "Who will create a FairTrade for media? That's every media player's next great challenge. MicroFox, still trapped in the confines of strategy 1.0, can't take it on. But somewhere out there is a Constructive Capitalist who will - and when they do, kiss big media goodbye." Umair Haque</a>, Harvard Business, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Google] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50856

Wow, I am so totally in the wrong business. A site-license for this 61-page report costs $4,825.00 USD. What it will tell you (according to the executive summary, available here) is that "The US market for Self-paced eLearning products and services reached $16.7 billion in 2009. The demand is growing by a five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.4% and revenues will reach $23.8 billion by 2014." Ah, well, I think I'll just keep on providing quality e-learning analysis and insights in OLDaily for free every day. Sam S. Adkins</a>, Ambient Research, November 26, 2009 [Tags: none] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50855

I've been following an interesting exchange on the BOAI mailing list based on this paper comparing the value of institutional archives versus sector-wide archives (I've abbreviated the title in the title of this post). Favoring the former, Stevan Harnad suggests "Institutions are the universal providers of all research output -- funded and unfunded, across all subjects, all institutions, and all nations." This is, of course, debatable, and we can argue that "researchers want and will use disciplinary services (look at usage stats for arXiv, ADS, SPIRES, RePEc, PMC, SSRN vs IRs)." More from Harnad today here. There is a slightly dated metalist of archive repositories, including subject based repositories, available online. Chris Armbruster and Laurent Romary</a>, Social Science Research Network, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Content Syndication, Research, Learning Object Repositories, Open Access] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50854

The Canadian Council for Learning has released another report, this time on quality in post secondary institutions in Canada. According to CEO Paul Capon, "Other countries have developed and implemented standards in an effort to maintain and improve the quality of their PSE sectors. We have to do the same." However, the report, which may be found on the CCL website, does not explain why "doing the same" is an imperative. Read the full PDF monograph. It asserts, "Canada lacks an informational framework through which to understand, measure or clearly demonstrate the quality of its PSE sector." This, they assert, is important to funders. "People who invest in human capital through a purchase of higher education do not know precisely what they are buying until well after the investment is made." (p. 19)

Yet there are measures, provided by institutions every year, which define the success of these institutions through the success of their graduates and the economic impact on communities. And really, if we want to be honest about this, the objective is to change the objectives of the system. "The job of determining the ultimate goals of post-secondary education, from which quality measures ought to derive, properly belongs to governments, institutions and stakeholders." Moreover, the measures undertaken in the countries that we 'must follow' have been widely criticized. The Bologna Process, for example, cited in the report as a model (p. 20), is not effective. "The Bologna Process is perhaps not so much about marketisation, as bureaucratisation: it means the reorganisation of higher education not around the market, but around a series of tick-box standards." And Australia's AUQA program is also questioned. "AUQA is fundamentally flawed. It has become a self-serving industry, the quality audit industry. It's not adding value to the higher education system and it's not giving rise to discussions about the sort of issues that are at the heart of quality."

Why Canada would emulate such programs, without an assessment demonstrating the value of such a program, is a mystery. Press Release</a>, Canadian Council for Learning, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Canada, Quality] [Link] [Comment]

http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=50853

This works; I tried it myself, and I must say, I prefer the new (proposed) interface. Stan Schroeder</a>, Mashable, November 26, 2009 [Tags: Google] [Link] [Comment]